#MeToo Redemption Not Possible

Save your apologies.

Back to Article
Back to Article

#MeToo Redemption Not Possible

PEXELS

PEXELS

PEXELS

You lost your job, friends and have spoiled your image after being exposed for sexual misconduct. You regret your actions and have released a public apology expressing your remorse as well as promising that it would never happen again. 

But that still isn’t enough to redeem yourself and the reality is that you may never bounce back from something like this. 

Coined in 2006 by Tarana Burke, the phrase “Me Too” and #MeToo was most commonly seen on social media for the purpose of raising awareness of sexual abuse and violence. 

Do you think redemption from a sexual misconduct accusation is possible?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Over a decade later and the phrase holds power through the #MeToo movement, giving people a platform to come forward and expose those who sexually violated them, in hopes of preventing similar incidents from taking place.

However, the accused and even the proven perpetrators of harassment have also come forward with an intent to redeem themselves. 

Over five women came forward to expose television commentator Mark Halperin for pervasive sexual behavior, causing him to lose his job as well as commentary deals. 

A year-and-a-half after after being outed as a sexual harasser and with the help of celebrity supporters, Halperin has made several public apologies hoping to be forgiven through redemption. Radio show host Michael Smerconish, believing that redemption is possible, even invited Halperin on Sirius XM radio to speak his truth and voice his remorse. 

But those who think redemption is impossible are rightfully outraged, especially Halperin’s victims. Burke herself has expressed that the main focus of Me Too should always be the support of survivors rather than the possible comeback of perpetrators. 

Me Too gives victims a platform to tell their stories, which is never an easy thing to do. But by shifting the focus from the victims and their stories to the perpetrators and their apologies, this platform is taken away. 

Victim’s motives are questioned once they come forward, making it even more difficult to open up about their stories. Many feel they won’t be taken seriously. 

Using the movement to focus on perpetrators makes it difficult for victims to talk about their experience, especially if the attention is centered around redeeming those who are the victimizers. 

If perpetrators want to apologize for their wrongs they should do so, but they should also keep in mind that forgiveness isn’t mandatory. 

The first step toward absolution is acknowledging wrongs. Just don’t expect that the slate can be wiped clean.